When is html5 out




















Good post Remy. The other question is when the rest of the web such as Google will start making use of HTML 5 so that our markup is indexed properly. Maybe they are doing this already but I think a lot of other things need to happen before HTML 5 is ready to be adopted by the masses. Go back to comparison off CSS 2. There is oversight of decisions within the W3C and all specifications go through a public consultation process. I think CSS is a bit of a different beast.

The main deciding factor on choosing which CSS spec or part of it to use depends on how you want to achieve a certain style. At the end of the day, people will choose to use what they want because of habit and getting them out of that is the tricky bit. Ich finde das Projekt sehr gut. Hoffentlich wird es sich durchsetzten, mir hat es jetzt schon sehr geholfen. View source on Google. A really good post to read. Browsers developers should help us in this way ;.

Nice to compare html5 to css2. Me Is my car ready? Car sales person Yes, but mind you, most petrol stations will sell the wrong petrol, and if you need a new tire then it would most likely will not fit without a convertor hint to audio tag. I, today, got 4 breaks at my work for software updates… As I stated: I hate the digital world. Create specs, create the product, release the finished product. Even though CSS 2. What we are starting to see is something relatively new, the web development community getting […].

The real question is when will HTML4 be ready? The answer is never. HTML4 was a failure. We made proprietary Internet Explorer apps with proprietary Flash audio video in them the whole time whether we wanted to or not. Read more about in , or when will HTML 5 be ready? Joeri Kassenaar really? How old is this threat? Seems to me that the video codec issue is de-railing so much it will have Flash video as a standard for a long time.

Maybe there is some hope, Steve Job is at least doing his best to keep ogg and flv off his divices. How it will exactly pan out know one quite knows or when , but at some point it will land as a standard and is the next logical […]. So html4 lasted 10yrs and will more than likely last another 10yrs. All the best with html5 dev and implimentation. Love to all. I am a little bit confused so it would be better if someone can help me! One hitch: there are other versions of the URL spec , muddying the waters for anyone who wants to know how the technology should work.

It's legal, but "oftentimes it comes pretty close [to] or is actual plagiarism. It's one of many instances of copying, Hickson said. Instead, it creates its own copies of some standards. It's very sad. The URL standard issue, though, isn't resolved yet, he said. For a period of time Hixie was editing both versions of the spec. I don't think there's any real issue with the fact that we continued the partnership as we jointly agreed to a few years ago," Jaffe said.

Jaffe, Cotton and the W3C are trying to move faster so, like the WHATWG's "living document' approach to standards, they're more in tune with the software world in which products are continuously updated. That speed comes from a shift to more smaller, more modular specifications; a streamlined process for standardization; and the embrace of "community groups" where interested parties can quickly tackle new technologies.

But the W3C isn't yielding on its core the idea that the world needs a "stable" standard. Take the case of a TV maker building a chip-based technology into a chip. When there are two versions of a spec, what's a programmer to do? There's no one answer. It's smart to look to the browser makers' developer sites for advice, though, since they hold the ultimate power of what happens on the Web.

If they don't like a particular standard, regardless of who crafted it, they can modify or omit it. And many new standards start as browser makers' ideas of what needs doing. One example concerns whether video streams sent with DRM must be encrypted.

Netflix's Mark Watson, a co-editor of the DRM video standard, argued Sunday at W3C that encryption brings too many technical difficulties and that consensus-based standards should take that sort of concern into account. But Ryan Sleevi, who works on Chrome's encryption and a related Web standard, said browser makers prioritize privacy regardless of what a particular standard says, consensus or not.

And making reference to the original split between browser makers and the W3C that spawned the WHATWG a decade ago, he said, "This has been the case time and time again. Correction, a. In the future new tests will be added for new specifications and existing tests will be updated when the specifications change. This will allow us to spend more time on HTML5test.

June - version 8. Created by Niels Leenheer.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000